Print ISSN: 2304-1455
Peer Review Policy
Our peer review policy has three main features:
- This policy is designed to evaluate the validity and quality of articles prior to publication. This supports the maintenance of the integrity of the knowledge domain to which the articles belongs and filters out irrelevant and poor-quality manuscripts (Eysenbach &Till, 2001).
- Our peer reviewers ensure that data is clearly presented and findings and conclusions are adequately supported by data.
- We follow the double-blind review process, which means neither authors nor reviewers are aware of each other’s identities or affiliations throughout the review process. Authors are instructed to prepare their manuscripts in such a way that their identities are not revealed. This anonymity prevents bias from either side.
Regarding plagiarism, replication, and duplication, we adhere to the COPE guidelines. In addition, as a Crossref member, Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development (AJARD) uses similarity checking tools recommended by Crossref. To ensure the originality of content, AJARD uses iThenticate software, a powerful, user-friendly tool, to detect plagiarism.
Additionally, in order to ensure publication ethics are applied throughout the peer review process, AJARD has clear and distinct policies for conflict of interest, human rights, and informed consent (COPE, 2011, 2015). To comply with the guidelines set out by COPE, we require authors to clearly state any conflict of interest regarding financial and non-financial matters. In cases where human subjects are involved, or if any research shows human health intervention, AJARD requires authors to submit their research for approval to their institutional ethics committee or review board. AJARD also ensures that authors have obtained informed consent from the participants, who are permitted to opt out of the research process at any stage. See publication ethical guidelines of AJARD for more details: http://www.aessweb.com/journals/5005/info/pe.
Our research articles, therefore, convey scientific validity and compatibility with state-of-the-art knowledge. The articles are not only comprehensible but also offer a valuable contribution to the knowledge domain.
References
Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). (2011, March). Flowcharts on how to handle common ethical problems. Retrieved from
http://publicationethics.org/files/Code_of_conduct_for_journal_editors_Mar11.pdf
Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). (2015, November). Flowcharts on how to handle common ethical problems. Retrieved from
https://publicationethics.org/files/cope-publication-ethics-flowcharts-full-set.pdf
Eysenbach G and Till JE (2001). Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities. The BMJ, 323: 1103-1105. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1103
https://www.crossref.org/services/similarity-check/
Editorial Board
- Applied Biosciences and Bioengineering Section
- Applied Dentistry and Oral Sciences Section
- Biomedical Engineering Section
- Applied Microbiology Section
- Applied Neuroscience and Neural Engineering Section
- Materials Science and Engineering Section
- Chemical and Molecular Sciences Section
- Nanotechnology and Applied Nanosciences Section
- Surface Sciences and Technology Section
- Environmental Sciences Section
- Green Sustainable Science and Technology Section
- Earth Sciences Section
- Ecology Science and Engineering Section
- Energy Science and Technology Section
- Optics and Lasers Section
- Acoustics and Vibrations Section
- Applied Physics General Section
- Quantum Science and Technology Section
- Applied Thermal Engineering Section
- Fluid Science and Technology Section
- Computing and Artificial Intelligence Section
- Mechanical Engineering Section
- Civil Engineering Section
- Electrical, Electronics and Communications Engineering Section
- Applied Industrial Technologies Section
- Food Science and Technology Section
- Robotics and Automation Section
- Aerospace Science and Engineering Section
- Marine Science and Engineering Section
- Transportation and Future Mobility Section
- Agricultural Science and Technology Section
- Additive Manufacturing Technologies Section
Please note that the order in which the Editors appear on this page is alphabetical, and follows the structure of the editorial board presented on the MDPI website under information for editors: editorial board responsibilities.
Members
Prof. Dr. Giulio Nicola Cerullo Website
Editor-in-ChiefDipartimento di Fisica, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza L. da Vinci 32, 20133 Milano, Italy
Interests: lasers; optical instruments; nonlinear optics; ultrafast optics; time-resolved spectroscopy
Prof. Dr. Samuel Adeloju Website
Section Editor-in-ChiefSchool of Chemistry, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia
Interests: nanobiosensors; nanomaterials; conducting polymers; electroanalytical chemistry; environmental chemistry; microbial fuel cells
* Section: Chemical and Molecular Sciences
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals