Comparative financial analysis of open-field and greenhouse crop rotation and green manure applications in organic strawberry production
a*Cukurova University Yumurtalik Vocational School, Turkey. Corresponding author Email: husaygi@gmail.com
b Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Cukurova University, Turkey.
ABSTRACT
This study investigated the profitability of open field crop rotation and greenhouse green fertilization along with farmland manure applications implemented to ensure sustainability of soil fertility in strawberry cultivation performed in line with the organic farming principles. In the open field experiment (1) Cowpea (Vigna sinensis L.), (2) Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), (3) Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) were used as the crop rotation plants. In the greenhouse experiment 1) Cowpea (Vigna sinensis L.), (2) Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.),) were used as green fertilizations. Also this study investigated the impact of certified organic farmland manure as [(1) farmland manured and (2) farmland manure-free] on the parcels. The study compared the profitability in organic strawberry cultivation between crop rotation application in open field and green manure incorporation under soil by conducting a financial analysis. To conclude, result of the financial analysis indicated that both in greenhouse and open field, the application which combined Cowpea and farmland manure was found to be more economical.
© 2017 AESS Publications. All Rights Reserved.
Keywords: Organic strawberry, Crop rotation, Greenhouse, Green fertilization, Farm manure
ARTICLE HISTORY: Received: 31-Jul-2017 , Accepted: 30-Sep-2017, Online available: 16-Oct-2017
Contribution/ Originality
This article ''As opposed the general belief in society the study proves that organic farming costs are lower than conventional farming costs and so there will be no reduction in the income of the manufacturer, consumers will be able to reach healthy products at low cost.'' contributes to the field of organic agriculture.
1. INTRODUCTION
All human activities are driven by the desire to satisfy human needs that arise within the boundaries of their assets. According to the science of economics the essential problem that human beings face is that human needs considered limitless are met through limited resources available. At the heart of these needs lies nutrition need. In this sense, agriculture, as the production source of the nutrients required to fulfil the nutrition need is indispensable.
Throughout centuries, agriculture has undergone changes with human beings and this change has gained pace with technological and industrial advances. Establishment of European Community in the late 60s and the policies it implemented to support agriculture and manufacture of pesticides and chemical fertilizers in 1970s contributed to this development. The initiative named 'Green Revolution' in agriculture was introduced in 1960s and 70s with the aim of offering a solution to the nutrition problem that arose out the rapid population growth particularly and this initiative only aimed at an increase in efficiency and use of synthetic chemical agricultural drugs and mineral fertilizers increased. However, because of these implementations that disregarded the fundamental principle of economics (that the resources to meet the needs are limited) great damages were made to our nature, in the other words our living environments, which is a vitally important agricultural source.
The adverse effects that green revolution caused in agriculture were primarily seen in developed countries where green revolution was intensely followed. Green revolution, which initially set out to offer a solution to the hunger problem in the World, not only failed to achieve this goal but also made enormous damages to the nature and human health. Scarce agricultural resources available (nature) began to lose their sustainable production ability in an irreversible manner. People began to seek alternative solutions to solve the problems that resulted from agricultural green revolution applications and to protect sustainable production ability of agricultural resources, in other words to protect the nature and human existence.
One of this alternative methods is ecological farming which is expressed with concepts such as alternative agriculture, biological agriculture, biodynamic agriculture, natural agriculture, low input agriculture, integrated agriculture system, good agricultural practices and organic agriculture. The ecological farming system aims to protect the natural balance disturbed as a result of bad practices by maximizing the efficient use of the resources. In this farming system, use of syntactic chemical fertilizers, drugs, and hormones is prohibited. Soil fertility, selection of the appropriate method for protection against diseases and pests, crop rotation, recycling plant wastes, green fertilization, use of organic wastes, animal manure and biological control and similar methods are among the methods applied within the scope of ecological farming. Organic agriculture is a system which aims to achieve high productivity in agriculture. The essential objective of it is to ensure production optimization safely in life chain among soil-plant-animal and human.
Ecological farming which started as a family business initially has gained a commercial dimension after it lost family business status. When ecological products began to be traded, there occurred the requirement for legal arrangements regarding control and certification. The rules to be conformed to during the production, processing, labelling, storing and marketing of the ecological products were specified by the legislations in a detailed way (Anonymous, 2005). All national and international standards about organic agriculture necessitate the control and certification of all steps followed about the product from soil to shelf. Through certificates an assurance is provided to the customers who aim to pursue healthy lives and to protect the environment by consuming organic products. Moreover, certification allows organic agricultural manufacturers to prove their that production takes place in accordance with the standards by documenting it and market their products at prices they are worth of.
Organic agriculture which started in Turkey in 1980s with conventional products such as dried grapes and dried figs in line with exportation demands, has showed significant developments in years. Organic agriculture activity started with eight products and has exceeded 200 products in recent years. As of 2016, in a total of 523.778 ha field, 489.671ha of which is production field and 34.106 ha of which is natural collection field, about 2.473.600 tons of production is made by 68.000 manufacturers (Table 1). A similar development is seen in the number of the firms that specialize in production, processing and marketing the products (Anonymous, 2017).
As a vast majority of the organic products (more than 85%) (Sayin et al., 2005) manufactured in Turkey are exported, the number and variety of organic food manufacturing is shaped in line with the demands from foreign countries. Production organization institutions employ farmers on contract to undertake organic food production because of its nature. Contracted production ensures price and sale assurance to manufacturers. The contract made specifies production conditions, price and rate of premium, if any, and secures the partners legally by reserving the right to take a legal action (Demiryurek, 2000; 2004; 2011).
However, in recent years, as a result of some disputes between organic product manufacturers and the companies that they have a contract with some manufacturers have begun to start their own unions. These manufacturers obtain their certificates from Control and Certification Institutions that they make a deal through their own organizations and try to market their organic products in and outside of Turkey on their own (Gunay, 2007; Demiryurek and Ceyhan, 2008).
Table 1: Organic agriculture plant production (transition period included)
Years | Number of Products | Number of Farmers | Farming Field (ha) | Natural Collection Field (ha) | Total Production Alani(ha) | Production Amount (ton) |
2002 | 150 | 12.428 | 57.365 | 32.462 | 89.827 | 310.125 |
2003 | 179 | 14.798 | 73.368 | 40.253 | 113.621 | 323.981 |
2004 | 174 | 12.751 | 108.598 | 100.975 | 209.573 | 377.616 |
2005 | 205 | 14.401 | 93.134 | 110.677 | 203.811 | 421.934 |
2006 | 203 | 14.256 | 100.275 | 92.514 | 192.789 | 458.095 |
2007 | 201 | 16.276 | 124.263 | 50.020 | 174.283 | 568.128 |
2008 | 247 | 14.926 | 109.387 | 57.496 | 166.883 | 530.224 |
2009 | 212 | 35.565 | 325.831 | 175.810 | 501.641 | 983.715 |
2010 | 216 | 42.097 | 383.782 | 126.251 | 510.033 | 1.343.737 |
2011 | 225 | 42.460 | 442.581 | 172.037 | 614.618 | 1.659.543 |
2012 | 204 | 54.635 | 523.627 | 179.282 | 702.909 | 1.750.126 |
2013 | 213 | 60.797 | 461.395 | 307.619 | 769.014 | 1.620.466 |
2014 | 208 | 71.472 | 491.977 | 350.239 | 842.216 | 1.642.235 |
2015 | 197 | 69.967 | 486.069 | 29.199 | 515.268 | 1.829.291 |
2016 | 225 | 67.878 | 489.671 | 34.106 | 523.778 | 2.473.600 |
Within this scope, taking into consideration that income inequalities in our country have a deeper effect on the people who live in rural areas and who do not have an opportunity to be engaged in other economic activities other than agricultural one, implementations are needed to enable especially people who live in mountain and forest villages to get better living conditions. It is foreseen that organic farming, as an alternative production system for the local people, could provide a production model which would increase the income and which fits the regional characteristics (Usal, 2006).
Usal (2006) investigated the profitability of organic agriculture in their study carried out to compare the activity results of the institutions that are engaged in conventional agricultural production with the institutions that are engaged in organic agriculture in the villages located in the highlands of Adana Toros Mountain and to reveal the possibility of organic agriculture manufacturing. Findings of the study indicated that the major reason why manufacturers want to be engaged in organic agriculture is that organic agriculture is an environmentally protective and healthy production model as well as the expectation of yield high income.
The reasons why strawberry is the most common and widely produced one among the berry fruits is that its farming dates back to old times and its multidimensional consumption (Turemis and Agaoglu 2013). Turkey is the third strawberry producer country worldwide and 3.857,05 tons' of this production was organic (FAO, 2015). According to TUIK (TSI) reports (2016) 1575 tones strawberries were produced in Adana. Strawberry, which is cultivated and produced in high quality worldwide, has also gained importance in our country, recently (Macit et al., 2006). Cultivar selection is a feature in strawberry production (Nacar, 2012).
2. MATERIAL AND METHOD
2.1. Material
The study was conducted within 1000 m2 open field and 1000 m2 glass greenhouse in Cukurova University Yumurtalik Research Station test field and fresh and frigo strawberry seedlings of Sweet Charlie species cultivated under organic seedling cultivation conditions were used as the plant material. The experiment was carried out in four cases of recurrence according to split parcel test pattern. In main parcels, crop rotation and green manure applications and in lower parcels Ekoflora organic farmland manure applications were examined.
The factors and their levels handled in the test are as follows:
Main parcel: Crop Alternation (CA) Application (Open Field):
- Cowpea (C),
- Bean (B),
- Cucumber (C),
- Fallow (F)
Lower parcel: Ekoflora Organic Farmland Manure (FM) Application
- With Ekoflora Organic Farmland Manure FM (+)
- Without Ekoflora Organic Farmland Manure FM (-)
Main parcel: Green Manure (GM) Application (Greenhouse):
- Cowpea (C),
- Bean (B),
- Fallow (F)
Lower parcel: Ekoflora Organic Farmland Manure (FM) Application
- With Ekoflora Organic Farmland Manure FM (+)
- Without Ekoflora Organic Farmland Manure FM (-)
In open-field agriculture system, each September seedlings were planted according to split test parcels test pattern divided in a way which will include 30-35 plants in each recurrence.
For the greenhouse, each October, which is the seedling planting time, seedlings were planted in a way which will include 30-35 seedlings in each recurrence.
In open fields and in greenhouse fields where strawberry seedlings would be planted the parcels where soil preparations were made and crop rotation was applied and Green manure parcels (main parcels) were divided into two. The compost used in the study was made juicy in line with the method specified by Brinton et al. (2004). It was determined at the end of the analysis that the juice contained 0.001% N; 0.02% P; 0.18% K. Applications were made in a way in which the juice obtained from 30 kg compost was provided to the irrigation system.
Juice preparation: After measuring 3% organic farmland manure and resting it in the necessary amount of water for 2 days, it was given to the plants. Fertilization was performed this way, however, no application was done on the other one. Farmland manure was applied on the parcel left fallow in crop rotation and on half of the Fallow parcel on which green fertilization was not performed. However, no fertilization was performed on the other half. At the end of the study, gross margin analysis was conducted in order to compare the profitability of the strawberry on which green manure was applied and the strawberry which was cultivated after open field crop rotation applications (Aras, 1988).
3. FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
The applications which performed in the greenhouse and open fields for organic strawberry cultivation is of importance in order to explore the best strawberry cultivation method. Additionally, financial data of these applications are significant in terms of the continuity of these applications and implementing them. Even though it is desired to apply organic agriculture methods that aim to achieve production for a sustainable agriculture without damaging the environment, it does not sound realistic to expect the manufacturers to undertake these applications without a financial support.
Macit et al. (2011) carried out a study in order to investigate the applicability of organic strawberry cultivation in Black Sea Agricultural Research Institute test field between 2004-2005. Financial analysis findings obtained from their study indicated that organic strawberry cultivation and conventional strawberry cultivation methods were examined with regard to profitability and both were found to be so. However, since they could not obtain accurate information about organic strawberry price, they could not make a financial comparison in terms of profitability between the cultivation methods. In our experiment, the most marketable product in organic strawberry cultivation carried out in open field was obtained from the parcel where cowpea was used as the previous crop and farmland manure was applied during crop rotation. From among the organic strawberry products that we put on the market with an average of 3 TL sale price, the highest profit was obtained from the parcel where Cowpea + farmland manure was applied with 7.921 TL. Whereas, the lowest profit was obtained from the fallow parcel, where no application was carried out with 1.920 TL. As presented in Table 2-3 since raw material input costs are quite similar, use of Cowpea+farmland manure application method in greenhouses and open fields would be financially more rational.
Table 2: Open-field organic strawberry production budget-I values
Budget | Applications | |||
Fallow | Bean | Cowpea | Cucumber | |
1. Annual Income | ||||
I. Yield per Crop (g/plant) | 178 | 263 | 288 | 239 |
II. Total Production kg (Crop Yield *6.000 Items/da)/1000 =600 Seedlings per Decare*Yield per Crop | 1.068 | 1.578 | 1.728 | 1.434 |
III. Total Income (TL/da) =Total Yield* Kg Price( 3 TL) | 3.204 | 4.734 | 5.184 | 4.302 |
2. Annual Income | ||||
I. Yield per Crop(g/plant) | 146 | 262 | 281 | 234 |
II. Total Production kg (Crop Yield *6.000 Items/da)/1000 =600 Seedlings per Decare*Yield per Crop | 876 | 1.572 | 1.686 | 1.404 |
III. Total Income(TL/da) =Total Yield* Kg Price( 3 TL) | 2.628 | 4.716 | 5.058 | 4.212 |
TOTAL INCOME 1ST YEAR+2ND YEAR | 5.832 | 9.450 | 10.242 | 8.514 |
2-YEAR PRODUCTION EXPENSES | Fallow | Bean | Cowpea | Cucumber |
I. Equipment Machinery Leasing(TL/da) | 25 | 115 | 115 | 115 |
II. Labour Costs(TL/da) | 2.050 | 2.050 | 2.050 | 2.050 |
III. Material Costs(TL/da) | 2.881 | 3.016 | 3.061 | 2.941 |
IV. Fixed Costs(TL/da) | 684 | 684 | 684 | 684 |
TOTAL COSTS(TL/da) | 5.640 | 5.865 | 5.910 | 5.790 |
NET PROFIT (TL/da) | 1.920 | 3.585 | 4.332 | 2.724 |
Table 3: Open-field organic strawberry production budget-II values
Budget | Applications | |||
Fallow+FM | Bean+FM | Cowpea+FM | Cucumber+FM | |
1. Annual Income | ||||
I. Yield per Crop | 308 | 386 | 400 | 313 |
II. Total Production kg (Crop Yield *6.000 Items/da)/1000 =600 Seedlings per Decare* Yield per Crop | 1.848 | 2.316 | 2.400 | 1.878 |
III. Total Income =Total Yield* Kg Price(3 TL) | 5.544 | 6.948 | 7.200 | 5.634 |
2. Annual Income | ||||
I. Yield per Crop | 274 | 343 | 385 | 289 |
II. Total Production kg (Crop Yield *6.000 Items/da)/1000 =600 Seedlings per Decare*Yield per Crop | 1.644 | 2.058 | 2.310 | 1.734 |
III. Total Income =Total Yield* Kg Price ( 3 TL) | 4.932 | 6.174 | 6.930 | 5.202 |
TOTAL INCOME 1ST YEAR+2ND YEAR | 10.476 | 13.122 | 14.130 | 10.836 |
2-YEAR PRODUCTION EXPENSES | Fallow +FM | Bean +FM | Cowpea +FM | Cucumber +FM |
I. Equipment Machinery Leasing(TL/da) | 25 | 115 | 115 | 115 |
II. Labour Costs(TL/da) | 2.125 | 2.125 | 2.125 | 2.125 |
III. Material Costs(TL/da) | 3.105 | 3.240 | 3.285 | 3.165 |
IV. Fixed Costs(TL/da) | 684 | 684 | 684 | 684 |
TOTAL COSTS(TL/da) | 5.939 | 6.164 | 6.209 | 6.089 |
NET PROFIT (TL/da) | 4.537 | 6.958 | 7.921 | 4.747 |
The most marketable product in organic strawberry production carried out in the greenhouse was obtained from the parcel where cowpea was used as the previous crop in green fertilization and farmland manure was applied. From among the organic strawberry products that we put on the market with an average of 3 TL sale price, the highest profit was obtained from the parcel where Cowpea + farmland manure was applied with 5.275 TL. Whereas, the lowest profit was obtained from the fallow parcel with 1.236 TL, where no application was carried out (Table 4-5).
Table 4: Greenhouse organic strawberry production budget-I
Budget | Applications | ||
Fallow | Bean | Cowpea | |
1. Annual Income | |||
I. Yield per Crop | 133 | 149 | 174 |
II. Total Production kg (Crop Yield *6.000 Items/da)/1000 =600 Seedlings per Decare*Yield per Crop | 798 | 894 | 1.044 |
III. Total Income (TL/da) =Total Yield* Kg Price( 3 TL) | 2.394 | 2.682 | 3.132 |
2. Annual Income | Fallow | Bean | Cowpea |
I. Yield per Crop | 249 | 304 | 317 |
II. Total Production kg (Crop Yield *6.000 Items/da)/1000 =600 Seedlings per Decare*Yield per Crop | 1.494 | 1.824 | 1.902 |
III. Total Income (TL/da) =Total Yield* Kg Price( 3 TL) | 4.482 | 5.472 | 5.706 |
TOTAL INCOME 1ST YEAR+2ND YEAR | 6.876 | 8.154 | 8.838 |
2-YEAR PRODUCTION EXPENSES | Fallow | Bean | Cowpea |
I. Equipment Machinery Leasing(TL/da) | 25 | 115 | 115 |
II. Labour Costs(TL/da) | 2.050 | 2.050 | 2.050 |
III. Material Costs(TL/da) | 2.881 | 3.016 | 3.061 |
IV. Fixed Costs(TL/da) | 684 | 684 | 684 |
TOTAL COSTS(TL/da) | 5.640 | 5.865 | 5.910 |
NET PROFIT(TL/da) | 1.236 | 2.289 | 2.928 |
Table 5: Greenhouse organic strawberry production budget-II
Budget | Applications | ||
Fallow+FM | Bean+FM | Cowpea+FM | |
1. Annual Income | |||
I. Yield per Crop | 162 | 192 | 241 |
II. Total Production kg (Crop Yield *6.000 Items/da)/1000 =600 Seedlings per Decare*Yield per Crop | 972 | 1.152 | 1.446 |
III. Total Income =Total Yield* Kg Price( 3 TL) | 2.916 | 3.456 | 4.338 |
2. Annual Income | Fallow +FM | Bean+FM | Cowpea +FM |
I. Yield per Crop | 355 | 376 | 397 |
II. Total Production kg (Crop Yield *6.000 Items/da)/1000 =600 Seedlings per Decare*Yield per Crop | 2.130 | 2.256 | 2.382 |
III. Total Income =Total Yield* Kg Price( 3 TL) | 6.390 | 6.768 | 7.146 |
TOTAL INCOME 1ST YEAR+2ND YEAR | 9.306 | 10.224 | 11.484 |
2-YEAR PRODUCTION EXPENSES | Fallow +FM | Bean+FM | Cowpea+FM |
I. Equipment Machinery Leasing(TL/da) | 25 | 115 | 115 |
II. Labour Costs(TL/da) | 2.125 | 2.125 | 2.125 |
III. Material Costs(TL/da) | 3.105 | 3.240 | 3.285 |
IV. Fixed Costs(TL/da) | 684 | 684 | 684 |
TOTAL COSTS(TL/da) | 5.939 | 6.164 | 6.209 |
NET PROFIT( TL/da) | 3.367 | 4.060 | 5.275 |
When open field and greenhouse models in organic strawberry production and were examined within the scope of Yumurtalik region climate conditions, it was found that open field organic strawberry production was more profitable than the greenhouse organic strawberry production from a financial perspective. Taking into account the climate expectations of strawberries, it was observed that Yumurtalik region climate provided natural greenhouse conditions for strawberries. Besides, it was seen that organic strawberry production took place in the greenhouse was adversely affected in the region where heat increases swiftly in spring months. Considering production input costs, it was found that it was possible to derive the highest profit in organic strawberry production from the open field in Yumurtalik region.
Atasay (2007) conducted a financial analysis in the study carried out on Directorate of Egirdir Fruit Research Institute Camarosa strawberry species between 2004-2006. This study compared the profitability obtained from conventional production and organic production applications. At the end of 2-year production applications, the highest profit was obtained from organic production application. Besides, amount of the production achieved was found to be highly similar between conventional production (4.206 kg/da) and organic production (4.072 kg/da).
No difficulties were encountered in marketing the products produced in the study with the desired price (3.00 TL in average). A high demand was observed in this field. However, some problems were encountered in preserving the products, supply of suitable packing materials, difficulty in transportation to the demanding markets. For a crop like fruit, which must be put into the market immediately after its harvest, facing such problems causes a loss in the marketable products. It would be possible to enhance profit by preserving the strawberries harvested under suitable conditions and by providing the necessary packing materials.
The findings obtained from the financial analysis of the abovementioned studies demonstrate that organic agriculture activities and organic strawberry production are still profitable despite some structural problems. The financial cost of the profit derived from protecting the natural resources for a sustainable agricultural production is excluded from this calculation.
4. RESULT
In the organic strawberry production carried out in open field where crop rotation was performed the highest profit (7.921 TL/da) was obtained from the parcel where Cowpea + farmland manure was applied, whereas, the lowest profit (1.920 TL/da) was obtained from the fallow parcel. In organic strawberry production carried out in the greenhouse where green fertilization applications were performed the highest profit (4.060 TL/da) was obtained from the parcel where Cowpea + farmland manure was applied, whereas, the lowest profit (1.236 TL/da) was obtained from the fallow parcel where farmland manure application was not performed. When open-field and greenhouse applications were compared, it was seen that the highest profit was derived from Cowpea + farmland manure application. In the financial analysis evaluations of the previously conducted studies, no problems regarding the low amount of production achieved or marketing were encountered during organic production transition process. In the present study problems encountered include preserving the product, supply of suitable packing materials, and difficulty in transportation to the demanding markets. Also in this study, other problems arose out of warm weather that adversely affected the organic strawberry production in the greenhouse. Similarly, the results obtained from financial analysis of the previous studies concluded that organic agricultural activities and organic strawberry production were profitable. Open-field organic strawberry production is recommended since open field organic strawberry production was found to be financially more profitable at the end of 2-year production activities.
To conclude, open-field organic strawberry production was found to be more economical for Yumurtalik (Adana) region because climate conditions of this region provide a natural greenhouse environment for strawberries.
One of the points that must be taken into account in order achieve sufficient yield and quality in organic strawberry production is the use of farmland manures obtained from organic farms or farmland manures certified for organic agricultural use. Additionally, use of farmland manure along with green fertilization materials is both economical and also enhances yield and quality to a great extent.
Funding: This study received no specific financial support. |
Competing Interests: The authors declared that they have no conflict of interests. |
Contributors/Acknowledgement: This study was funded by Cukurova University Scientific Research Project Intuitional Unit (Project no: ZF2010D28). This article is a part of doctoral dissertation by Hulya SAYGI. |
Views and opinions expressed in this study are the views and opinions of the authors, Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development shall not be responsible or answerable for any loss, damage or liability etc. caused in relation to/arising out of the use of the content. |
References
Anonymous (2005). Ecological agriculture in the world. http://www.eto.org.tr.
Anonymous (2017). http://www.tarim.gov.tr/Konular/Bitkisel-Uretim/Organik-Tarim/Istatistikler.
Aras, A. (1988). Agricultural accounting. ege univ. faculty of agriculture. Yay. No: 486, Izmir, 323s.
Atasay, A. (2007). An investigation on the application of organic strawberry production in egirdir (Isparta) conditions. pHD Thesis, Cukurova University, Institute of Science and Technology Department of Horticulture, Adana, Turkey, 179p. view at Google scholar
Brinton, W., Storms P., Evans E., & Hill J. (2004). Compost teas microbial hygiene and quality in relation to method of preparation. Biodynamics, 197, 12-15. view at Google scholar
Demiryurek, K. (2000). The analysis of information systems for organic and conventional hazelnut producers in three villages of the black sea region. Turkey. PhD Thesis. Reading: The University of Reading, UK. view at Google scholar / view at publisher
Demiryurek, K. (2004). Organic agriculture in the world and Turkey. Harran University. Journal of Agricultural Faculty, 8(3- 4), 63-71. view at Google scholar
Demiryurek, K. (2011). The concept of organic farming and the situation of organic agriculture in Turkey and the world. GOU, Journal of Agricultural Faculty, 28(1), 27-36. view at Google scholar
Demiryurek, K., & Ceyhan, V. (2008). Economics of organic and conventional hazelnut production in Turkey. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 23(3), 217-227. view at Google scholar / view at publisher
FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization). (www.fao.org). (Access: May 2015).
Gunay, S. (2007). An example on the beginning and the effects of ecological hazelnut agriculture in Turkey: Camlica Village (Samsun). Ecology, 63, 7-15.
Macit, I., Koc, A., Guler, S., & Deligoz, I. (2011). Organic strawberry breeding in the black sea region. T. C. Ministry of agriculture and rural affairs. General Directorate of Agricultural Researches, Ankara / Turkey, pp. 87-94. http://www.tagem.gov.tr.
Macit, I., Koc A., & Akbulut, M. (2006). Determination of yield and quality of strawberry cultivars in samsun coastal condition. 2nd National Strawberry Symposium, 14-16 September 2006. Tokat. 70-74. view at Google scholar
Nacar, C. (2012). Strawberry farming. (General directorate of agricultural researches and politics, ministry of food, agriculture and livestock alata horticultural research station erdemli-mersin, Turkey), 2s.
Sayin, C., Brumfield, R. G., Ozkan, B., & Mencet, N. M. (2005). The organic farming movement in Turkey. Production and Marketing Report, Hort Technology, 15(4), 864-871. view at Google scholar
Usal, G. (2006). A study on the possibilities of increasing producer revenues through organic agriculture in Taurus mountain villages, Thesis Doctorate. Cukurova University, Adana, 2006. (Unpublished).
Turemis, N., & Agaoglu S. (2013). Strawberry (Part 2) (Ed. Sabit Agaoglu and Resul Gercekcioglu) Uzumsu Meyveler Ankara Tomurcukbag Ltd. Sti. Educational Publications, 1, 55-117.
TUIK (Turkish Statistical Institute) (2016). Main statics, organic crop production. URL. http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/UstMenu.do?metod=temelist. (Erisim: Eylul 2017)