DO PRESCHOOL TEACHERS’ PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS PLAY A ROLE IN ENHANCING THEIR UNDERSTANDING OF ECCE TRAINING?

Subadrah Madhawa Nair1+ --- Sopia Md Yassin2

1 Department of Education, HELP University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

2Director of NCDRC, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjung Malim, Malaysia

ABSTRACT

Preschool teachers’ professional development and professional qualifications are crucial in enhancing the quality of children’s education. Studies related to the quality of preschool education and preschool teachers’ professional qualifications are very limited in Malaysia. As such, this study embarks on finding the effects of ECCE teachers’ professional qualifications on their understanding of overall ECCE training, perceptions of the quality of ECCE training, understanding of ECCE curriculum, and their understanding of the teaching and learning process. This study employed the descriptive research design using questionnaires to collect the data. The sample of the study consists of 296 preschool teachers from West Malaysia. The findings indicate that the ECCE teachers’ professional qualifications have a significant effect on their understanding of the ECCE training. The results also show that ECCE teachers with higher professional qualifications have better perceptions of the quality of ECCE training compared with their counterparts with lower professional qualifications. The findings affirmed that the ECCE teachers with higher professional qualifications have a significantly better understanding of the ECCE curriculum compared to those with lower professional qualifications. These findings have crucial theoretical, pedagogical and practical implications in early childhood education.

Keywords:Preschool teachers, professional qualifications, ECCE training, ECCE curriculum, Teaching and learning, Malaysia.

ARTICLE HISTORY: Received: 26 June 2017, Revised: 2 August 2017, Accepted: 10 August 2017, Published: 22 August 2017

1. INTRODUCTION

Preschool teachers’ professional development and professional qualification are crucial in enhancing the quality of children’s education. Sheridan et al. (2009) have also stressed that the knowledge, skills and practices of early childhood educators are important factors in determining how much a young child learns and how prepared the child is for entry into school. Preschool education prepares children with emotional and social competences which contribute positively to their school readiness and academic success. According to Avalos (2011) teachers’ professional development is “learning how to learn, and transforming their knowledge into practice for the benefit of the students’ growth”. According to a report by NAEYC (2015) preschool teachers’ professional development is a continuum of learning and support activities designed to prepare individuals for work with and on behalf of young children and their families, as well as ongoing experiences to enhance this work. These provide platforms for preschool teachers to improve their knowledge, skills, practices and dispositions of early childhood professionals.

ECCE training for educators includes everything that is taught and learned and how it is evaluated (Brewer, 2007). In other words, what is taught refers to the contents of instructions, whereas how it is taught refers to the skills, teaching materials, teaching environment, the various approaches used by preschool teachers and elements of diversity interaction with children, parents and family. Evaluation refers to the assessment strategies used by the preschool teachers throughout the instruction process. In other words, as stressed by OECD (2015) teachers with high professional qualification have extensive pedagogical content knowledge and skills, better problem solving strategies, better adaptation for diverse learners, better decision making skills, better perception of classroom events, greater sensitivity to context, and greater respect for students. In terms of ECCE education, OECD (2006) also stressed that preschool teachers’ professional qualifications and training will help enhance their quality of interaction and pedagogy skills in the classroom. This is because the higher their professional qualification, the better their knowledge, competencies and skills as preschool educators. Workman and Ullrich (2017) also stressed that teacher is the most critical component of quality in early childhood education. As such, they need to have the foundation knowledge of child development and the pedagogical knowledge to promote children’s learning at various ages.

A study by Marcy (2003) revealed that teachers with four-year degrees in early childhood education were effective teachers and had positive interaction with children than those without these credentials. The findings also highlighted that children who had teachers with a bachelor's or associate's in early childhood education demonstrated stronger receptive vocabularies compared with children who were taught by teachers holding only a high school diploma. The study also affirmed that in order to secure high quality in early childhood education preschool teachers and child care providers need to acquire at least a bachelor's degree with specialized early childhood training. In other words the findings indicated that preschool teachers’ professional qualifications affect their understanding of ECCE curriculum and have an impact on their teaching and learning activities.

Guerriero (2015) and Blömeke and Delaney (2012) opined that professional competence involves more than just knowledge. Other variables such as skills, attitudes, and motivation also contribute to teachers’ professionalism and the mastery of teaching and learning. On the other hand Slavin (1984) advocated that besides content knowledge and pedagogical  knowledge,  teachers need to know children’s aptitude, their general ability, prior knowledge and motivation to learn. Content knowledge and pedagogical knowledge are also important in planning and carrying out effective and meaningful learning activities. As such it can be concluded that teachers’ knowledge, their professional qualifications and child motivation are fundamental in children’s learning outcome.

Similarly studies by Hill et al. (2005); Baumert et al. (2010) and Voss et al. (2011) indicate that teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge have an impact on the quality of instruction and children’s learning outcome. Preschool teachers with higher professional qualification are rich in content knowledge and pedagogical knowledge. As such, they are more creative and able to plan and carry out the learning activities effectively compared to those with lower professional qualifications. According to Barnett et al. (2012) in US twenty-nine state-funded preschool programs currently require teachers with a bachelor’s degree because teachers’ qualification matters  in the enhancement  of preschool education. Similarly Early et al. (2007) opined that a comprehensive professional development for preschool teachers could provide the knowledge, skills, and support for teachers to provide high-quality early education for children.

In addition, a study in South Australia Krieg et al. (2015) revealed that children who attended early childhood education programs that were of higher quality with higher staff qualifications and more engaging children's activities,  showed a greater gain in cognitive development than children who attended lower quality programs. The results of their study also suggested that early childhood teachers’ professional qualifications affect their quality of teaching and children’s cognitive development. The findings also indicated that children who benefitted the most from attendance in these programs were children from backgrounds of greater social disadvantage than children from less disadvantaged backgrounds.

In relation to the quality of early childhood education, Lara-Cinisomo et al. (2009highlighted that there are three dimensions of classroom experiences which are important for children in preschool. These are first teacher-child interactions, second, learning environment, and third learning opportunities. They stressed that variation in children’s experiences in preschool may also be a result of teacher training in early childhood education. Teachers with higher professional qualifications will be able to deliver quality preschool experiences to children because they have a more in-depth knowledge of the curriculum, training, skills and pedagogy.

In Malaysia, all preschools including those in the public and private sectors have to follow all the guidelines stated in the Standard National Preschool Curriculum (SNPC) set by the Malaysian Ministry of Education (MOE) in 2010 (Mariani, 2016). However the professional qualifications of the preschool teachers in Malaysia range from a certificate to diploma, degree, Masters and PhD.

The objectives of the Malaysian preschool education cover six learning areas; they are:

  1. language and communication
  2. cognitive development
  3. socio-emotional development
  4. spiritual and moral development
  5. physical development and
  6. aesthetic and creative development.

Public preschools in Malaysia consist of the KEMAS preschool, PERPADUAN preschool, PERMATA preschool and the Ministry of Education (MOE) preschool. In addition there are also Islamic preschools under the state government such as Jabatan Agama Islam Negeri (JAIN), Angkatan Belia Islam Malaysia (ABIM) and Yayasan Pembangunan Keluarga Terengganu (YPKT). There are also private preschools such as the Montessori preschool, HighScope preschool, Reggio Emilia preschool, Bank Street preschool and Waldorf preschool. Apart from these, there are also international preschools such as Sri Bestari preschools, GEMS International Preschools, HELP International Preschools, Matrix International Preschools and many others. According to Lily and Mohamed (2013) the majority of parents prefer to send their children to private preschools compared with public preschools. Their study also revealed that the reasons for choosing the private preschools are because of their high quality programmes and their teachers are well trained and qualified. Similarly a study by Badei and Sulaiman (2014) in Kuala Lumpur also highlighted that the quality and qualification of private preschool teachers are higher than those in the public preschools. Since parents place high importance on the quality of preschool teachers, private preschools are the choice of well-to-do parents because they deem quality education as being crucial to their children.

Studies related to the quality of preschool education and preschool teachers’ professional qualifications are very limited in Malaysia. As such, the current study embarks on finding the effects of ECCE teachers’ professional qualifications on their understanding of overall ECCE training, perceptions of the quality of ECCE training, understanding of ECCE curriculum, and their understanding of the teaching and learning process.

1.1. Research Questions

This study attempts to answer the following research questions (RQ):

  1. Do preschool teachers’ professional qualifications have a significant effect on their understanding of overall ECCE training?
  2. Do preschool teachers’ professional qualifications have a significant effect on their perceptions of the quality of ECCE training?
  3. Do preschool teachers’ professional qualifications have a significant effect on their understanding of ECCE curriculum?
  4. Do pre-school teachers’ professional qualifications have a significant effect on their understanding of teaching and learning process during ECCE training?

2. METHODOLOGY

This study employed the descriptive research design using questionnaires to collect the data. The sample of the study consists of 312 preschool teachers from West Malaysia but only 296 completed the questionnaire (124 respondents from public preschools and 172 from private preschools). As such, 17 respondents who did not complete the questionnaires were dropped from the study. From the 296 respondents, 46 of them had a Degree/Masters/PhD qualification, 92 of them had Diploma qualifications and 158 of them had below Diploma qualifications (ECCE teaching certificates).

The questionnaire consists of two sections (A & B); Section A is on respondent’s demography while Section B consists of 40 items on training (3 constructs). The 1st construct is on the teachers’ understanding of the quality of the ECCE training (12 items); the 2nd construct is on teachers’ perceptions of ECCE curriculum content (14 items) and the 3rd construct in on their understanding of teaching and learning (14 items). The items in the questionnaire used 4 Likert Scales (4 = strongly agree, 3 = agree, 2 = disagree, 1 = strongly disagree). The scores for each construct were obtained by adding the scores of all the items in the construct. The overall score for ECCE training was obtained by adding the scores of all the three constructs. The data obtained from the questionnaires were analyzed using SPSS programme for Windows; the One-way ANOVA test and Tukey HSD were used for data analysis.

3. FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION

Table-1. The mean score and SD of teachers for their overall ECCE training, quality of training, ECCE curriculum, teaching and learning

Teachers’ Qualification   Overall ECCE Training Quality of Training ECCE Curriculum Teaching & Learning
Below Diploma Mean
N
SD
128.18
158
13.77
39.08
158
4.75
44.08
158
5.13
44.82
158
5.34
Diploma   Mean
N
SD
130.84
92
15.02
39.60
92
5.14
45.84
92
5.85
45.45
92
5.48
Degree/Masters/PhD   Mean
N
SD
134.62
46
11.96
41.28
46
4.27
46.67
46
5.08
46.56
46
4.87

The findings in Table 1 indicate that the teachers with Degree/Masters/PhD qualification had higher scores for overall  ECCE training (Mean = 134.62, SD = 11.96) compared to teachers with Diploma qualifications (Mean = 130.84, SD = 15.02) and teachers with below diploma qualifications (Mean = 128.18, SD = 13.77).

Teachers with Degree/Masters/PhD qualifications also have a better perception of the quality of training (Mean = 41.28, SD = 4.27) compared to their counterparts with diploma qualifications (Mean = 39.60, SD = 5.14) and below diploma qualifications (Mean = 39.08, SD = 4.75).

The findings also indicate that teachers with Degree/Masters/PhD qualifications have a better understanding of ECCE curriculum (Mean = 46.67, SD = 5.08) compared to those with Diploma (Mean = 45.84, SD = 5.85) and below diploma qualifications (Mean = 44.08, SD = 5.13).

Teachers with Degree/Masters/PhD qualifications also have a better understanding of classroom teaching and learning process (Mean = 46.56, SD = 4.87) compared to those with diploma (Mean = 45.45, SD = 5.48) and below diploma qualifications (Mean = 44.82, SD = 5.34).

RQ1: Do pre-school teachers’ professional qualifications have a significant effect on their overall understanding of ECCE training?

Findings from the one way ANOVA test in Table 2 indicate that teachers’ professional qualifications have a significant effect on their overall understanding of ECCE training (F=3.71, df=294, p=.02). As such, these findings answer RQ1. The findings reveal that teachers with higher academic qualifications can understand better the ECCE training than their counterparts with lower professional qualifications and the difference is significant. These findings are parallel to findings by Early et al. (2007) which indicated that professional development for preschool teachers equipped them with knowledge, skills and support for providing a high-quality education for preschool children. In addition the findings also support findings by Krieg et al. (2015) which demonstrated that preschool teachers’ higher qualifications contribute to better children’s cognitive development because they are rich in knowledge and pedagogy and able to engage children actively in the process of learning.

Table-2a: One-way ANOVA test indicating teachers overall understanding of ECCE training

  Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
ECCE
Training
Between
Groups
1437.02 2 718.51 3.71 .026
Within Groups 52340.96 294 193.86    
Total 53777.99 296      

The level of significance is at p<0.05

Table-2b: Tukey HSD test comparing teachers’ understanding of overall ECCE training  based on their professional qualifications

Dependent variable Professional Qualification Professional Qualification Mean Difference SD Sig.
Understanding of ECCE Training Tukey
HSD
Below
Diploma
Diploma -2.66 1.90 .341
Degree/Masters/
PhD
-6.44* 2.44 .o243
Diploma Below
Diploma
2.66 1.90 .341
Degree/Masters/
PhD
-3.78 2.62 .320
Degree/Masters/
PhD
Below
Diploma
6.44* 2.44 .024
Diploma 3.78 2.62 .320

The level of significance is at p<0.05

Tukey HSD test was carried out to do a multiple comparison among teachers based on their professional qualifications. Findings from the Tukey HSD test indicate that teachers with below diploma qualification have lower understanding of overall ECCE training compared to their counterparts with diplomas but the difference is not significant (Mean difference = -2.66, p=.341). Teachers with below diploma qualification also have a lower understanding of the overall ECCE training compared to those with a Degree/Masters/PhD and the difference is significant (Mean difference = -6.44, p=.024).

Teachers with diploma qualifications have a better understanding of overall ECCE training compared with those with below diploma qualifications but the difference is not significant (Mean difference = 2.66, p=.341). On the other hand, teachers with diploma qualifications have a lower understanding of the overall ECCE training compared to their counterparts with Degree/Masters/PhD but the difference is not significant (Mean difference = -3.78, p=.320).

The findings from Tukey HSD conclude that teachers’ academic qualifications have a significant impact on their overall understanding of ECCE training. Teachers with higher academic qualifications have a better understanding   of overall ECCE training compared to those with lower academic qualifications.

RQ2: Do pre-school teachers’ professional qualifications have a significant effect on their perception of the quality of ECCE training?

Table-3a. One-way ANOVA test indicating teachers understanding of quality of ECCE training

  Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Quality of ECCE
Training
Between
Groups
172.512 2 86.256 3.74 .025
Within Groups 6765.376 294 23.090    
Total 6967.889 296      

The level of significance is at p<0.05

Findings in Table 3a indicate that there is a significant difference in teachers perception of the quality of ECCE training according to their academic qualifications and the difference is significant (F=3.74, p=.025). Therefore, RQ2 is answered. The findings affirm that teachers with higher academic qualifications perceived a higher quality of ECCE training compared with their counterparts with lower academic qualifications. As stressed by Barnett et al. (2012) preschool teachers’ qualification matters in understanding the preschool training and later they are able to deliver quality education to children.

Table-3b. Tukey HSD test comparing teachers’ perception of the quality of ECCE training according to their professional qualifications

Dependent variable Professional Qualification Professional Qualification Mean Difference SD Sig.
Quality of ECCE Training Tukey
HSD
Below
Diploma
Diploma -.52 .63 .69
Degree/Masters/
PhD
-2.20 .81 .01
Diploma Below
Diploma
.52 .63 .69
Degree/Masters/
PhD
-1.68 .87 .13
Degree/Masters/
PhD
Below
Diploma
2.20 .81 .01
Diploma 1.68 .87 .13

The level of significance is at p<0.05

Tukey HSD test was carried out for the purpose of a multiple comparison among teachers on the quality of ECCE training according to their professional qualifications. Findings in Table 3b indicate that teachers with below diploma qualifications have a lower mean score in their perception on the  quality of ECCE training compared with teachers with diploma qualifications (Mean difference=-.52, p=.69) but the difference is not significant. Teachers with below diploma qualification also have a lower mean score compared with those with Degree/Masters/PhD qualification (Mean difference=-2.20, SD=.63,  p=.01) and the difference is significant.

Teachers with a diploma qualification have a higher mean score in their perception of quality of ECCE training compared with those having below diploma qualifications (Mean difference=.52, SD=.63,  p=.69) and the difference is not significant. On the other hand teachers with a diploma qualification scored lower mean than those with Degree/Masters/PhD qualifications (Mean=-1.68, SD.87, p=.13) but the difference is not significant.

Findings from Tukey HSD test conclude that teachers’ professional qualification (Degree/Masters/PhD) has a significant effect on their perception of the quality of ECCE training compared to those with below diploma qualifications.

RQ3: Do pre-school teachers’ professional qualifications have a significant effect on their understanding of   ECCE curriculum?

Table-4a. One-way ANOVA test indicating teachers understanding of  ECCE curriculum

  Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
ECCE
Training
Between
Groups
317.062 2 158.531
5.534 .004
Within Groups 8106.737 294 28.646    
Total 8423.737 296      

 The level of significance is at p<0.05

Table-4b. Tukey HSD test comparing teachers understanding of  ECCE curriculum

Dependent variable Professional Qualification Professional Qualification Mean Difference SD Sig.
Understanding of ECCE Training Tukey
HSD
Below
Diploma
Diploma -1.76 .72 .039
Degree/Masters/
PhD
-2.59 .91 .013
Diploma Below
Diploma
1.76 .72 .039
Degree/Masters/
PhD
-.83 .98 .68
Degree/Masters/
PhD
Below
Diploma
2.59 .91 .013
Diploma .83 .98 .68

The level of significance is at p<0.05

Tukey HSD test was carried out for the purpose of a multiple comparison among teachers on their understanding of the ECCE curriculum based on their professional qualifications. Findings  from Tukey HSD test in Table 4b indicate that teachers with below diploma qualification have lower understanding of ECCE curriculum compared to those with diploma qualifications and the difference is significant (Mean difference=-1.76, SD.72, p=.039).  Teacher with below diploma qualification also have a lower understanding of ECCE curriculum compared to teachers with Degree/Masters/PhD (Mean difference=-2.59, SD=.91, p=.013).

Teachers with a diploma qualification have higher understanding of ECCE curriculum compared to those with below diploma qualifications (Mean difference= 1.76. Sd.72, p=.039) and the difference is significant. On the other hand teachers with a diploma qualification have a lower understanding of ECCE curriculum compared to those having Degree/Masters/PhD (Mean=-.83, SD=.98, p=.68) but the difference is not significant.

Findings from Tukey HSD test conclude that preschool teachers with higher professional qualifications have a better understanding of the ECCE curriculum compared with teachers with lower academic qualifications.

RQ4 Do pre-school teachers’ professional qualifications have a significant effect on their understanding of teaching and learning process during ECCE training?

Table-5a. One-way ANOVA test indicating teachers understanding of teaching and learning  process during ECCE training

  Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
ECCE
Training
Between
Groups
106.098 2 53.049 1.875 .155
Within Groups 8290.737 294 28.296    
Total 8396.834 296      

The level of significance is at p<0.05

Findings in Table 5a indicate that there is no significant difference in  teachers’ understanding of teaching and learning process during the  ECCE training, based on their academic qualifications and the difference is  not significant ( F=1.875, p=.155). As such, these findings answer RQ 4 and Tukey HSD test was not carried out for a multiple comparison among teachers on their understanding of the ECCE teaching and learning based on their professional qualifications. The findings also affirm that ECCE teachers’ professional qualifications have no significant effect on their understanding of teaching and learning process in the classroom.  These findings support the notion by Slavin (1984) who advocated that besides content knowledge and pedagogical  knowledge teachers also need to know children’s aptitude, their general ability, prior knowledge and motivation to carry out interactive teaching and learning effectively.

4. CONCLUSION

This study has revealed some pertinent findings. Firstly, the findings indicate that the ECCE teachers’ professional qualifications have a significant effect on their understanding of the ECCE training. Secondly, the results clearly show that ECCE teachers with higher professional qualifications have better perceptions of the quality of ECCE training compared with their counterparts with lower professional qualifications, and the difference is significant. Thirdly, the findings affirm that the ECCE teachers with higher professional qualifications have a significantly better understanding of the ECCE curriculum compared to those with lower professional qualifications.  Fourthly, the results reveal that ECCE teachers professional qualifications have no significant effect on their understanding of teaching and learning processes. The findings of this study also have crucial theoretical, pedagogical and practical implications. In terms of theoretical implications the findings support the notion that teachers’ professional qualification matters in enhancing their perception of the quality of ECCE training, understanding of ECCE training and the ECCE curriculum. In terms of pedagogical implications the current research concludes that teachers with higher professional qualifications are well equipped with knowledge and skills which enable them to gauge the quality of ECCE training, understand the ECCE training and the ECCE curriculum better than the teachers with lower professional qualifications. As stressed by OECD (2015) preschool teachers with higher professional qualifications are better teachers because they are more knowledgeable, have better skills, have better practices and are more effective. In terms of practical implication, this study advocates that a first degree should be the minimum qualification for the preschool teachers because the results indicate that the ECCE teachers with higher professional qualifications are well equipped with knowledge and skills compared to their counterparts with lower academic qualifications. Therefore, the Ministry of Education should take this matter seriously and take the necessary steps to provide funding and training to preschool teachers to enhance their professional qualifications. In order to come up with viable remedy, the Teachers Training Division should also train more preschool teachers at degree level to enhance our preschool education to be on par with other developed countries.  

There are some limitations in this study; firstly this study only employed quantitative data to investigate whether preschool teachers’ level of professional education affects their perception of the quality of ECCE training, understanding of ECCE training and the ECCE curriculum. As such it is hoped that future research should also employ qualitative data from interviews and observations to get a more in-depth understanding of the issue. It is also hoped that future research will involve a larger sample from East and West Malaysia.  The current study only used SPSS Program for Windows for quantitative data analysis. It is hoped that future studies will employ software’s analysis like NVIVO and other procedures to analyze the qualitative data.

Funding: This study is fully funded by NCDRC RESEARCH Grant 2015-0024-106-04-2 Development of A Comprehensive and Integrated Model of Quality Malaysian ECCE.
Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Contributors/Acknowledgement: Both authors contributed equally to the conception and design of the study.

REFERENCES

Avalos, B., 2011. Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1): 10-20.View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher

Badei, M. and T. Sulaiman, 2014. The difference between Montessori curriculum and Malaysian preschool curriculum on developmental skills of preschool children in Kuala Lumpur. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioral Sciences, 4(4): 101372-101385.View at Google Scholar 

Barnett, W.S., M.E. Carolan, J. Fitzgerald and J.H. Squires, 2012. The state of preschool 2012: State preschool yearbook. New Brunswick, NJ: National Institute for Early Education Research.

Baumert, J., M. Kunter, W. Blum, M. Brunner, T. Voss, A. Jordan and Y.M. Tsai, 2010. Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1): 133-180. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher

Blömeke, S. and S. Delaney, 2012. Assessment of teacher knowledge across countries: A review of the state of research. ZDM Mathematics Education, 44(3): 223-247. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher

Brewer, J.A., 2007. Introduction to early childhood education: Preschool through primary grades. 6th Edn., Boston: Pearson Education.

Early, D.M., K.L. Maxwell, M. Burchinal, R.H. Bender, C. Ebanks and G.T. Henry, 2007. Teachers’ education, classroom quality, and young children’s academic skills: Results from seven studies of preschool programs. Child Development, 78(2): 558 – 580. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher

Guerriero, S., 2015. Teachers’ pedagogical knowledge and the teaching profession. OECD Background Report and Project Objectives. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/ceri/Background_document_to_Symposium_ITEL-FINAL.pdf .

Hill, H.C., B. Rowan and D.L. Ball, 2005. Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievements. American Education Research Journal, 42(2): 371-406.View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher

Krieg, S., D. Curtis, L. Hall and L. Westenberg, 2015. Access, quality and equity in early childhood education and care: A South Australian study. Australian Journal of Education, 59(2): 119-132. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher

Lara-Cinisomo, S.L., A.S. Fuligni, L. Daugherty and C. Howes, 2009. A qualitative study of early childhood educators’ beliefs about key preschool classroom experiences. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 17(1). View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher

Lily, M.M. and N.A.A. Mohamed, 2013. Preschool education in Malaysia: Emerging trends and Implications for the future. American Journal of Economics, 3(6): 347-351. View at Google Scholar 

Marcy, W., 2003. Bachelor's degrees are best: Higher qualifications for prekindergarten teachers lead to better learning environments for children. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED480817.pdf.

Mariani, M.N., 2016. Education 2030 national priorities and challenges in education 2030: Trend and issues in ECE.

NAEYC, 2015. Promoting high quality early learning by connecting practice, policy and research. Retrieved from http://www.naeyc.org/content/about-naeyc.

OECD, 2006. Encouraging quality in early childhood education and care (ECEC). Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/school/49322232.pdf.

OECD, 2015. Encouraging quality in early childhood education and care (ECEC).

Sheridan, Edwards, Marvin and Knoche, 2009. Professional development in early childhood programs: Process issues and research needs. Early Education and Development, 20(3): 377-401.View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher

Slavin, R.E., 1984. Component building: A strategy for research-based instructional improvement. Elementary School Journal, 84(3): 255-269.View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher

Voss, T., M. Kunter and J. Baumert, 2011. Assessing teacher candidates’ general pedagogical/psychological knowledge: Test construction and validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(4): 952–969. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher

Workman, S. and R. Ullrich, 2017. Quality 101: Identifying the core components of a high quality early childhood program. Retrieved from https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/early-hildhood/reports/2017/02/13/414939/quality-101-identifying-the-core-components-of-a-high-quality-early-childhood-program/

Loading...