PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT BREACH AND FEELINGS OF VIOLATION: MODERATRING ROLE OF AGE-RELATED DIFFERENCE

Imran Sharif^1† --- Shah Rollah Abdul Wahab² --- Azlineer Sarip³

¹PhD. Student, Faculty of Management, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, ^2,3 Faculty of Management, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

Keywords: Psychological contract breach, Feelings of violation, Age.

1. INTRODUCTION

Previous research work based on Argyris (1960); Schein (1965) and Rousseau (1995) explored deep notions of psychological contract for well understanding the relationship between employee and employer. Since decades, enormous practitioners and scholars are investigating the pack conception about psychological contracts (Robinson and Morrison, 2000; Turnley et al., 2003; Ng and Feldman, 2008; Conway and Briner, 2009; Bala, 2013). Grippingly, the process and mechanism of psychological contract observes as in pivotal framework for excogitating employee and organization relationship (Rousseau, 1995). There are two basic theories behind this psychological contract mechanism one of them is inducement (employer) contribution (employee) model (March and Simon, 1958) and social exchange (Blau, 1964) these theories are widely known as organization member relationship theory.

A phenomenon behind social exchange theory is the mutual obligation for each other which have to fulfill the expectations between employee and employer (Chambel and Castanheira, 2012). Social exchange has three fundamentals respectively as relationship, exchange and reciprocity. Social exchanges amongst both parties commence when a party start giving benefit to other. When the beneficiary (employee or employer context) reciprocates, it creates demand to give benefits in return. Resultantly, this develops a mutual obligation between both parties.

The research on psychological contract has paying attention on perceived mutuality, duties and promises. As a result, (Rousseau, 2001; Bala, 2013) reported that promises can be made symbolically, verbally or informally. Based on this elaboration, it can be perceived the promise made by the organization with employee may not be seen formally. If a return was offered to employees in an organization, then it was thought by the other employees that reward is available for the rest of the employees but award, recognition or promotion all depends upon the contribution and quality of their work (Syed, 2010).

Psychological contracts enclosed two types as transactional and relational (Macneil, 1985; Rousseau and Greller, 1994). Transactional contract carries monetary exchange and extrinsic relationship between employee and organization (Conway and Coyle-Shapiro, 2012). On the other hand, the main theme behind the relational contract is the emotional and trustworthy attachment with the organization, where employee is taken only as an employee basically he should be considered as real asset for the betterment of the organization and vise versa with socio-emotional, intrinsic and non-monetary contracts between employer and employees (Rousseau, 1995). In relational contracts, loyalty and commitment of the organization are considered as a matter of much for the developing contributor’s intention and loyalty along with sense of being valued in return (Maguire, 2002).

The current research work is an attempt to explore what happens when employer remains fail to meet the obligations and expectation with employees. Then at the very next moment employees go through the state of contract breach (Bal and Smit, 2012) which leads to feeling of violation (Robinson and Morrison, 2000; Raja et al., 2004). And on the call of reported it should be explored does age of the employee can mitigate the negative effect of contract breach which triggers the feeling of violation. So, the aim of this paper was to investigate the role of age in reactions to psychological contract breach towards negative effect of employees as feeling of violation.

2. THEORY AND HYPOTHESES

In current era, organizations confronted with a large number of changes in their workplace environment, due to change in external environment such as globalization, tough market competition, technological advancement and governmental regulations. In time of organizational advancements and changes, the construct of psychological contract received high importance in employment relationship (Robinson, 1996; Syed, 2010). The terms of the employment agreement are being frequently managed, reformed, and renegotiated to fit changing environments (Syed, 2010). With current worldwide economic crises, organizations are unable or less willing to meet employee perception and expectations which ultimately lead to contract breach (Robinson and Morrison, 2000).

Since the global financial crisis, organizations in all sectors have faced considerable financial and economic pressures. Organizations try to manage the economic crises and debt issues (Abdul-Rahman and Ayorinde, 2013) by different ways, some organizations changing their policies such as Cost cutting initiatives (redundancies) restructuring and refiguring organizational paradigms with downsizing, acquisitions and merger (Noer, 2000). These structural changes have impact on employee-employer relationships in different ways (Syed, 2010). These changes are more likely to affect what organization expecting from their employees and organizations in return offering to their employees. In this reciprocal exchange relationship employee’s contract found to be breached or promised by organizations do not kept so forth (Guest and Conway, 2001; Bal and Smit, 2012; Jamil et al., 2013). So, current research examines the psychological contract breach which leads to feeling of violation but the effect of contract breach can controlled by the moderating role of age. During economic downturn, employee’s expectations are also reduced on the basis of their perceptions about job availabilities (Rousseau, 1995). In the same way, government laws are also influential on employee’s psychological contracts through impacting their environment, training, working hours, pay rates and termination of their contracts. Until or unless employer is failing to meet all promises kept with employees they cannot be able to delight the actual customers because this is a exchange relationship must be fulfilled on fair bases (Guest, 2004; Rousseau, 2004; Zhao et al., 2007).

3. PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT BREACH

Psychological contracts are perceptions for employees that what they obliged to employers, and what employers obliged to them. It is not possible that loyalty may be always there in psychological contracts (Sims, 1994) if we define contract it’s a type where responsibilities, misreading for employers and employees increase and it leads to breach of contract and many employees think or believe that employers breach somewhat their employment agreement (Robinson and Rousseau, 1994). The psychological contract is a person’s viewpoint about the terms and thinking of exchanged agreement between two parties (Rousseau, 1995). Psychological contract breach divided into two components Obligations and its fulfilment, to partly cover of and between related construct and psychological contract create problems. It is important to examine the work of employer to considerate the behaviour of employee (Rousseau, 1995).

The previous research shows that psychological contract is very common between parties (Robinson and Rousseau, 1994). Psychological contract violates when one party fails to fulfill the agreement with the other party (Robinson and Rousseau, 1994). The contract breach is a mutual consideration of completing a contract, depends on what other party promised to fulfill and provide to other (Morrison and Robinson, 1997). Psychological contracts are beliefs, obligations and trust between the employees and employers (Argyris, 1960; Rousseau, 1995).

A psychological contract is an agreement on mutual obligations (Argyris, 1960; Levinson, 1965). Psychological contract is necessary for making the relationship between the employers and employees. These are committed for exchange of benefits which you get in future, e.g. a promise of contribution of work done and get Salary, promotion, incentives in the exchange. And these obligations provide future benefits to employers or employees (Rousseau, 1995). Psychological contract is a trust beliefs, perceptions, and promises between the employees and employers. It set the way to work to be done (Feldheim and Liou, 1999). They divide psychological contract into two types:

Transactional: It’s a monetary based and expectations are clear in it, fairly compensation on good work and punish is included in it in inappropriate works.

Relational: It’s an emotional based and expectations are on the share beliefs, share values and respecting the relationships.

4. FEELINGS OF VIOLATION

Feelings of violence occur when co-workers have negative feelings and negative emotions about other employees of organization. Williams (2001) that 80 percent of violence occur in organization due to bad organization culture or 20 percent is because of mistakes of workers. He defined that this 80 percent of violence can eliminate after changing the bad organizational culture into good and flexible culture. Raja et al. (2011) violation tells about the powerful emotional experience. Violation is defined as linking feelings of disloyalty and deeper grief; it’s a aggressiveness, injustice and unfair damage (Williams, 2001). Rousseau (1989) violation is emotional familiarity, it generate from a process whose nature is cognitive (Morrison and Robinson, 1997) but this process is flawed and does not need awareness by the person who occupied in it (Lazarus, 1991; Raja et al., 2011). Violation is a feeling of anger, offence, and acrimony and infuriate too and it is treat as mistreated (Schein, 1965; Rousseau, 1989; Amollo, 2013). Violation includes the issue of procedural fairness, it tells about the treatment with the individuals at workplace. When fail to repeat it creates wrong work done dishonesty, disloyalty in the relations of employment (Rousseau, 1989).

5. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT BREACH AND FEELINGS OF VIOLATION

Employees may refuse to give the promised contribution to employers, when employers fail to fulfill their agreement. Psychological contract breach is responsible for bad behavioral actions towards the employers (Rousseau and McLean, 1993; Robinson et al., 1994). Research shows that psychological contract breach has a high impact on changing the relationship of employment, it increase the chances of breach of contract between two parties (Robinson et al., 1994) The anger, mistrust leads to psychological contract breach and disturb the ways on which contract has been fulfilled (Morrison and Robinson, 1997). The idea about the sensitivity of equity is that people have different understandings about justified our unjust conditions and it have positive or negative impact on their attitudes and behaviours (Huseman et al., 1987; Miles et al., 1989).

The aggressiveness at work place could have harm affect on the relations in organization which leads to conflicts. Rule of feeling the emotions may cause in increasing the loyal commitment of employees towards organization by generating interest for their job (Salovey et al., 2002). The equity sensitivity has positive impact on organizational commitment or satisfaction about the work, and negative impact to leave the organization Violation of psychological contract gives outcome as in anger (Rousseau, 1989; Robinson et al., 1994). The feeling of anger increases the emotion and disturbs the body which leads to increase the blood pressure and heart beating rate. Psychological contract have great impact on employee behaviours and attitudes, if psychological contract is out of order in thinking of employees then feelings of violence generate (Raja et al., 2004).

Hypothesis 1: Psychological contract breach is positively related to feelings of violation

6. AGE AND FEELINGS OF VIOLATION

The aging personnel present growing challenges for the organizations in the coming twenty years (Peterson and Spiker, 2005). Because of declining fertility rates, aging of the baby boom generation and increased of expectancy. It is reported that there are presently larger number of older employees in the labor market. Therefore, governments like the European Commission in the favor of older employees to keep continuity in working, even after the retirement age. In spite of this change in workforce demographics and government is in the favor of the older workers to serve labor market and a small number of institutions keenly put in order for these changes (Kanfer and Ackerman, 2004; Ng and Feldman, 2008). This may be partly due to the relative scarce knowledge available on how older workers differ from younger workers.

However, previous study has explored that employees belonging to different age’s group behave differently in employment relationship (Bal and Smit, 2012). For instance, in psychological contract between employer and employee’s relationship, tendency of the old worker’s perception is found lesser towards intense reaction as compare to younger employees (Bal et al., 2008; Ng and Feldman, 2008). Which explains as the perception of employees that organization did not meet the obligations and promises in one’s psychological contract. Rousseau (1995) ultimately, employees fall into the degree of breach and then leads to violence (Morrison and Robinson, 1997). Moreover, employees with higher age group have strong sense of regulating the emotional skill on the adverse events happening on work setting (John and Gross, 2004; Bal et al., 2008).

Hypothesis 2a: In case of older workers age is negatively related to feelings of violation.

Hypothesis 2b: In case younger worker age is positive related to feelings of violation.

6.1. Moderating Role of Age between Psychological Contract Breach and Feelings of Violation

Older employees are familiar that how to properly take action to harmful events due to their wisdom and understanding towards the objects which give them a helping hand to deal with such kind of harmful violence (John and Gross, 2004) this is not a matter of much for older workers to submissive their negative reactions against contract braches which trigger thee violent behavior at the workplace. Hence, when older workers make use of suppression against negative actions, their positive psychology towards stimulus can be affected (i.e. higher negative affect and lower positive affect). Knight et al. (2007) demonstrated through experimental research that when older people have to suppress their emotions, they become distracted and more inclined to be drawn to negative stimuli, consequently, leading to more negative outcomes. However, this was not the case for younger people.

In case of younger employees have diminutive work experience to deal with negative circumstances arise on workplace from employer side and abruptly start adversely reacting in work setting. Because these age groups do not have enough idea yet to learn that how to fittingly respond to such negative events. a younger worker tend to respond with frustration and anger when experienced the psychological contract breach, this ultimately leads towards negative reactions amongst senior and junior or in employment relationships, when younger workers go through suppression basically are not getting the pain away but consequently increasing the negative outcomes. Thus, controlling the adverse emotion is not basically a guard against cynicism of younger employees; on the other hand, it disapprovingly impact on affective well-being of older workers (Knight et al., 2007). Hence, it is found that expect a three-way interactive effect between age, psychological contract breach and feeling of violence and the severity of adverse reaction is found in younger workers

Hypothesis 3: Age moderates the relationship between psychological contract breach and feeling of violation such that feeling of violation is low in older employees than in younger one’s

6.2. Model of the Study

6.3. Methods & Masures

In a brief way simply the objectives of this research is explained in this research and provide the guarantee to the respondents to keep and use data in a confidential way. Top nine private and semi government organizations located in Pakistan were choose for surveys. Three of them were the branches of top banks; two were well established schools, three private companies and one hospital. In a brief paragraph it is explained the purpose, main cause of this study and provide assurance to keep this data confidential.

Surveys were filled by the employees working as upper level managers, middle level managers and low level managers. Total 250 surveys were distributed among these organizations. Response rate was 200 surveys out of which 184 complete responses included in the analysis. The respondents who filled these surveys have a mean age of 31.5 and standard division of 7.7.

Perceived contract breach was measured by five items scale which is developed by Robinson and Morrison (2000). Five likert scales were used to measure perceived contract breach. These measures helps to identify what an employee thinks about the organization were he/she works. Such as (My employer has broken many of its promises to me even though I have upheld my side of the deal). Reliability measured for perceived contract breach was .761%.

Feeling of violation was measured by four items scale which was developed by Robinson and Morrison (2000). Five liter scale (1=strongly disagree to 5= strongly agree) was used to measure feeling of violation of .feeling of violation described the negative feeling about contract fulfillment with measures such as (I feel extremely frustrated by how I have been treated by my organization) the reliability which was measured for feeling of violation was .934%.

7. RESULTS

The regression is followed by two steps. In step 1 used control variable which becomes a hurdle in the significance of the relationships of the independent variable and the moderator. In the step 2 used independent variable to run the regression and get values of β, R² and ∆R². Organization was tending towards the variable which is responsible of lowering down the significance of the independent variable and for the step 2 used contract breach as independent variable.

Feelings of violation Regression shows positive results with feeling of violations which show that contract breach is the predictor of Feeling of violation as proposed in the hypothesis 1. Results are significant with β=-0.079 so our hypothesis is accepted.

	Feeling of Violtion
Predictors	β	R²	∆R²
Step:1
Control variable		0.025
Step:2
Contct Breach	0.79*	0.031	0.006*

n=184, control variable was organization* P < .05** P < .01*** P < .001

Result revealed that contract breach explained 31 percent of the variation in feeling of violation and remaining by other factors. Moreover, β value is also found to be significant.

7.1. Moderation Analysis

In moderation hierarchal regression where three steps procedure is followed. In first step the same control variable is entered. In the second step entered the centered values of independent variable and the moderator. Then the interaction terms of centered independent variable and centered moderator of the last step. This is the procedure which is followed for the moderation.

	Feeling of Violation
Predictors	β	R²	∆R²
Step:1
Corol variable		0.04
Step:2
Contract Breach	0.079*
Age	0.07	0.05	0.07
Step3
Int CB * Age	0.014*	0.07	0.02*

n=184, control variable was organization* P < .05** P < .01*** P < .001

This table shows that the moderation of Age in between relationship of contract breach and feeling of violation. The table shows that contract breach has significant relationship with feeling of violation. Moreover, moderating effect of age is also found significant. Therefore, we accept the hypothesis of the study for moderating effect of age such that effect of contract breach will be less towards feeling of violation for older employee’s than for younger one’s.

8. DISCUSSION

The aim of this research work was to explore the relationship of psychological contract breach with feeling of violation. Further, the most important thing was to investigate the moderating role of age-related difference between psychological contract breach and feeling of violence. The theoretical conclusion of this investigation recommend that an employee’s view point towards observation of unmet promises (psychological contract breach) triggers and increase the sense of betrayal and anger as feeling of violence. In this current research work it is theoretically proved that age has a vital association between psychological contract breach and feeling of violence and the reaction of the workers examined differently according to the age group. in the course of perceptions of psychological contract breach, specifically, workers adapt certain kind of behavior and attitude for their organization and set up their intentions accordingly on the work setting (Zhao et al., 2007).

Though, the consequences explored from the literature that relationship between employee and organization totally depend upon employee age; usually, it was found that younger employee’s reaction reported severely on the job in case of contract breach than that of old-aged employees. The main purpose of this research work is found from the literature that old-aged employees are able enough to buffer the negative reaction towards breach of psychological contract (Ng and Feldman, 2008). Even though, the perception of contract breach may be strongly related to feeling of violation. But it is less perceived by older employee than younger employees.

The results of the present study are in the procession with the idea derived from socio-emotional selectivity theory (Carstensen, 2006) which throws the ample light on the concept that old-aged individuals focus largely to show positive psychology on workplace and set aside the negative reactions as the dependent variable (feeling of violence) in this study. And the performance and satisfaction level are less harmed when breach of psychological contract occurs than younger ones. On the other hand, the current result has found in emotion regulation (Gross, 2001) according to this finding, with the passage of time individual seems to be a mature enough to overcome the negative emotions with the help of long life experience and can easily handle the conflicting emotions (Diamond and Aspinwall, 2003). For example, it is reported that facing interpersonal workplace conflict for aged people tendency is less to perceive the negative emotions than younger individual (Birditt et al., 2005) and “older people are better at regulating their emotions after negative events than younger people and are quicker at returning to positive moods” (Carstensen et al., 2003; John and Gross, 2004).

In this way, it is found that emotional reactions of the employees vary from age group to age group as (older to younger people) old is gold than younger (Bal et al., 2008). The same thing is applied when individual perceive the breach of psychological contract, and younger reacts rapidly towards violation or negative outcomes as compare to the old workers.

The results of the previous study (Raja et al., 2011) investigated that psychological contract breach is positively associated with feeling of violence (Morrison and Robinson, 1997) furthermore, it is meaningful that psychological contract assessment are basically trigger by incidents that occur and normally which is emotionally significant (Zhao et al., 2007).

Exchange of social relationship between people is affective inherently in its nature (Morrison and Robinson, 1997). That is why; it is attempted here in this review of wide range of literature and came to the point that regulation of emotional reactions of older and younger towards feeling of violence after perceiving breach of contract vary from age to age. As literature showed that old people remains patient, high performer, committed, and loyal while perceiving breach of contract as compare to young people.

Older employees definitely have dissimilar school of thought for psychological contract than from younger workers (Anderson and Schalk, 1998). Resultantly, cost personal and environmental changes effects on changing the nature of psychological contract over time (De Vos et al., 2003). As people get older their physical and biological health decline and perceive less breach, on the other side, younger employees when join as workforce in aan organization have higher level of expectation, but tendency of being patience towards reality come after long passage of time (De Vos et al., 2003). Old employees might have realistic approach to deal with an organization about how and what to get than younger (Bal et al., 2008). Therefore, a psychological contract breach may be perceived less damaging to older worker than to younger worker.

Finally, it is explored that psychological contract breach–feeling of violence relationship; it appeared that moderating role of age has a strong relationship to buffer the negative outcome as violation which comes after perceiving psychological contract breach.

9. CONTRIBUTION AND IMPLICATIONS

Though, there was a large number of literature available on the outcome of feeling of violence, but regulations to avoid such kind of negative reaction after breach of psychological contract is not much in its nature. It is investigated thee antecedents and process through which the violent feelings emerge. Psychological contract is basically the main theme supported by theory of social exchange and equity theory explained as reciprocal exchange agreement between employer and employee. But when this expectations do not kept so forth from employer side then at the very next moment employee enter the state of psychological contract breach and leads to violent feelings (Rousseau, 1989; Morrison and Robinson, 1997).

It was discussed earlier, psychological contract breach and psychological contract violations are used interchangeably (Suazo et al., 2005). But literature showed that first employee perceive psychological contract breach and then at the thrush hold point become biologically physically exhausted and start reacting negatively, this is called a violence in mood. All this has happened due to misperceiving the psychological contract or it may be the employer’s inability to meet promises with employee and knowingly organizations do not want to fulfill those expectations. In short, the concept psychological contract is badly influenced by wrong perceptions and beliefs between reciprocal exchange agreement of employer and employee. Regarding this proposed model it is noticed that there is a clear distinction between both construct as psychological contract breach and feeling of violence.

In this model, it is focused to enrich the existing literature of psychological contract. First, it is identified that there is a positive relationship between breach and violence and have a clear distinctions between these constructs.

Second, it is highlighted that some breach do not drive the employee’s emotion to perceive actual violence rather than from the idiosyncratic and subjective dimension of psychological contract. So, it is an important to get intentions for the future researchers that how to get organizational members to realize when employee perceived violence was really caused by breach or some other antecedents of feeling of violence are there which need to explore. This understanding will definitely open up the new horizon of minds for contract breach and reduce the feeling of violence.

Third, the major contribution in this model lies to avoid some portion of violence by introducing the moderating role of age-related difference between psychological contract breach and feeling of violence. Usually, it is not discussed how to cope the feelings of violence. It is a natural phenomenon in the organizations, sometime employer’s inability, economic downfall; merger and acquisition create hurdles on the way of keeping the promises. It is theoretically explored that old workers perceive less feeling of violence due to their knowledge, experience and maturity factors. Because they have less job opportunities and life long experience support them to avoid aggression as feeling of violence in spite of perceiving psychological contract breach. On the other hand, younger worker abruptly feel violent approach while experiencing breach of psychological contract. So, violence is the outcome of contract breach, which ultimately go beyond the limitations of reciprocal fair principle derived from social exchange theory and equity theory. Mostly, the top level management of McDonald’s are old-aged employees because they have much more progressive approach to manage activities in well mannered as compare to younger ones.

10. IMPLICATIONS OF THE STUDY

This study also has significant implication for workers and organization regarding that how to buffer the perception of psychological contract breach and the adverse emotions as feeling of violence. Employers for instance, can contribute a pivotal role in reducing the perception of contract breach and feeling of violation if they hire employees on the basis of age. It is recommended that top level management of the organization must be in the hand of old and matured people who can make strategies and policies to run the organizational function with the help of younger workers. This is most important thing for the employers to construct well-defined organizational culture where the obligations and expectations can be easily met in reciprocal employment relationship recommended in social exchange theory. When the promises and obligations will be taken by an employer just for granted then the exploitation of the psychological contract will have enormous barriers on the way of organization’s development. This psychological contract breach will leads to feeling of violence.

Organizational members as human resource managers and first line managers play a very important role in planning and caring the psychological contract of employees (Guzzo and Noonan, 1994; Guzzo et al., 1994). This is the way through which they can reduce the feeling of violence and breach of psychological contract breach can also be minimized by informing the realistic job overview to the new incumbents and there should be a frequent flow of clear communication regarding contribution from employee side and inducements from employer side. So that expectations and obligation can be met after hiring the employees. Employee’s demands for obligations and expectations should be on priority, promises must be met by the employers over time and especially during the time of organizational change. Because when organizations go for merger and acquisition then most of time employer fails to meet promises and obligation (Guzzo and Noonan, 1994; Kemal and Shahid, 2012).

11. FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS

Present research work proposed that moderating role of age between psychological contract breach and feeling of violence; future researchers should concentrate on investigating the objectives job outcomes as job stress, intention to quit, absenteeism and job performance. In call for responses paper published in reputed journals as (Zhao et al., 2007; Syed, 2010) argued that breach of psychological contract is related to various types of job related behaviors, some other important moderators between feeling of violence and job related outcomes are necessary to explore. Moreover, by dent of labor shortage in many countries and currently change in employee retirement age after sixty-five are working after their retirement. Though, older employees greater than the age of 50 are still under presented in the research of psychological contract to date (Zhao et al., 2007; Bal et al., 2008; Syed, 2010; Bal and Smit, 2012). Therefore, the additional need is necessary to investigate that how old employee perceives the psychological contract when workers keep their work continue even after the retirement age. It is reported that ratio of old employee’s working in the market is rapidly increasing day by day (Bal et al., 2008).

Lastly, there is a need to clearly investigate that which age related group the people experience psychological contract breach and feeling of violence and refers to societal, social, psychological and biological changes (De Lange et al., 2006). For example, age is associated with time served the work setting (Wright and Bonett, 2002) and to future time perspectives. Future research should study in depth how age-related factors, such as family status and tenure are allied to the psychological contract.

12. CONCLUSION

In this research work theoretically investigated that age has a very significant role in that how breach of psychological contract occurs and feeling of violence and age affectively buffer the negative outcomes as violent behavior perceived less in old aged but age span is not clearly mentioned as compare to younger workers. This coping behavior is supported by several theories as socio-emotional selectivity theory (Carstensen et al., 2003) affective event theory (Weiss and Cropanzano, 1996) and model of emotional regulation in the study of psychological contract, it was investigated that when individuals become old, negative reactions after breach of psychological contract is perceived less than in the age of prime.

REFERENCES

Abdul-Rahman, O.A. and A.O. Ayorinde, 2013. Post merger performance of selected Nigerian deposit money banks-an econometric perspective. International Journal of Management Sciences and Business Research, 2(8): 49-59.

Amollo, P.M., 2013. Relationship between perceptions of psychological contract violation and employees commitment to implementation of strategic change at the barclays bank of Kenya. Nairobi: University of Nairobi

Anderson, N. and R. Schalk, 1998. The psychological contract in retrospect and prospect. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(S1): 637-647.

Argyris, C., 1960. Understanding organizational behavior. Oxford, England: Dorsey Understanding.

Bal, P.M., A.H. De Lange, P.G. Jansen and D.V.M.E. Van, 2008. Psychological contract breach and job attitudes: A meta-analysis of age as a moderator. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72(1): 143-158.

Bal, P.M. and P. Smit, 2012. The older the better! Age-related differences in emotion regulation after psychological contract breach. Career Development International, 17(1): 6-24.

Bala, I., 2013. The psychological contract: The changing nature of employee–employer expectations. International Journal of Management & Infomation Technology, 3(1): 62-70.

Birditt, K.S., K.L. Fingerman and D.M. Almeida, 2005. Age differences in exposure and reactions to interpersonal tensions: A daily diary study. Psychology and Aging, 20(2): 330-340.

Blau, P.M., 1964. Exchange and power in social life. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

Carstensen, L.L., 2006. The influence of a sense of time on human development. Science, 312(5782): 1913-1915.

Carstensen, L.L., H.H. Fung and S.T. Charles, 2003. Socioemotional selectivity theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life. Motivation and Emotion, 27(2): 103-123.

Chambel, M.J. and F. Castanheira, 2012. Training opportunities and employee exhaustion in call centres: Mediation by psychological contract fulfilment. International Journal of Training and Development, 16(2): 107-117.

Conway, N. and R.B. Briner, 2009. Fifty years of psychological contract research: What do we know and what are the main challenges. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 24(71): 71-131.

Conway, N. and J.A.M. Coyle-Shapiro, 2012. The reciprocal relationship between psychological contract fulfilment and employee performance and the moderating role of perceived organizational support and tenure. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85(2): 277-299.

De Lange, A., T. Taris, P. Jansen, P. Smulders, I. Houtman and M. Kompier, 2006. Age as a factor in the relation between work and mental health: Results from the longitudinal TAS survey. Occupational Health Psychology: European Perspectives on Research, Education And Practice, 1: 21-45.

De Vos, A., D. Buyens and R. Schalk, 2003. Psychological contract development during organizational socialization: Adaptation to reality and the role of reciprocity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(5): 537-559.

Diamond, L.M. and L.G. Aspinwall, 2003. Emotion regulation across the life span: An integrative perspective emphasizing self-regulation, positive affect, and dyadic processes. Motivation and Emotion, 27(2): 125-156.

Feldheim, M.A. and K.T. Liou, 1999. Downsizing trust. M@ n@ gement, 2(3): 55-67.

Gross, J.J., 2001. Emotion regulation in adulthood: Timing is everything. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(6): 214-219.

Guest, D., 2004. Flexible employment contracts, the psychological contract and employee outcomes: An analysis and review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 5(1): 1-19.

Guest, D. and N. Conway, 2001. Organisational change and the psychological contract: An analysis of the 1999 CIPD survey. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.

Guzzo, R.A. and K.A. Noonan, 1994. Human resource practices as communications and the psychological contract. Human Resource Management, 33(3): 447-462.

Guzzo, R.A., K.A. Noonan and E. Elron, 1994. Expatriate managers and the psychological contract. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4): 617-626.

Huseman, R.C., J.D. Hatfield and E.W. Miles, 1987. A new perspective on equity theory: The equity sensitivity construct. Academy of Management Review, 12(2): 222-234.

Jamil, A., U. Raja and W. Darr, 2013. Psychological contract types as moderator in the breach-violation and violation-burnout relationships. Journal of Psychology, 14(5): 491-515.

John, O.P. and J.J. Gross, 2004. Healthy and unhealthy emotion regulation: Personality processes, individual differences, and life span development. Journal of Personality, 72(6): 1301-1334.

Kanfer, R. and P.L. Ackerman, 2004. Aging, adult development, and work motivation. Academy of Management Review, 29(3): 440-458.

Kemal, M.U. and S. Shahid, 2012. Mergers, acquisitions and downsizing: Evidence from a financial sector. Global Business and Management Research, 4(1): 112-122.

Knight, M., T.L. Seymour, J.T. Gaunt, C. Baker, K. Nesmith and M. Mather, 2007. Aging and goal-directed emotional attention: Distraction reverses emotional biases. Emotion, 7(4): 705-714.

Lazarus, R.S., 1991. Cognition and motivation in emotion. American Psychologist, 46(4): 352-367.

Levinson, H., 1965. Reciprocation: The relationship between man and organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 9(4): 370-390.

Macneil, I.R., 1985. Relational contract: What we do and do not know. Wis. L. Rev, 3: 483-525.

Maguire, H., 2002. Psychological contracts: Are they still relevant? Career Development International, 7(3): 167-180.

March, J.G. and H.A. Simon, 1958. Organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Miles, E.W., J.D. Hatfield and R.C. Huseman, 1989. The equity sensitivity construct: Potential implications fo. Journal of Management, 15(4): 581-588.

Morrison, E.W. and S.L. Robinson, 1997. When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops. Academy of Management Review, 22(1): 226-256.

Ng, T.W. and D.C. Feldman, 2008. Can you get a better deal elsewhere? The effects of psychological contract replicability on organizational commitment over time. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(2): 268-277.

Noer, D., 2000. Leading organizations through survivor sickness: A framework for the new millennium. The organisation in crisis. Oxford: Blackwell.

Peterson, S.J. and B.K. Spiker, 2005. Establishing the positive contributory value of older workers: A positive psychology perspective. Organizational Dynamics, 34(2): 153-167.

Raja, U., G. Johns and S. Bilgrami, 2011. Negative consequences of felt violations: The deeper the relationship, the stronger the reaction. Applied Psychology, 60(3): 397-420.

Raja, U., G. Johns and F. Ntalianis, 2004. The impact of personality on psychological contracts. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3): 350-367.

Robinson, S.L., 1996. Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 574-599.

Robinson, S.L., M.S. Kraatz and D.M. Rousseau, 1994. Changing obligations and the psychological contract: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 37(1): 137-152.

Robinson, S.L. and E.W. Morrison, 2000. The development of psychological contract breach and violation: A longitudinal study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(5): 525-546.

Robinson, S.L. and D.M. Rousseau, 1994. Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(3): 245-259.

Rousseau, D., 1995. Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Rousseau, D.M., 1989. Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2(2): 121-139.

Rousseau, D.M., 2001. Schema, promise and mutuality: The building blocks of the psychological contract. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(4): 511-541.

Rousseau, D.M., 2004. Psychological contracts in the workplace: Understanding the ties that motivate. Academy of Management Executive, 18(1): 120-127.

Rousseau, D.M. and M.M. Greller, 1994. Guest editors overview: Psychological contracts and human resource practices. Human Resource Management, 33(3): 383-384.

Rousseau, D.M. and P.J. McLean, 1993. The contracts of individuals and organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 15: 1-1.

Salovey, P., L.R. Stroud, A. Woolery and E.S. Epel, 2002. Perceived emotional intelligence, stress reactivity, and symptom reports: Further explorations using the trait meta-mood scale. Psychology and Health, 17(5): 611-627.

Schein, E.H., 1965. Organizational psychology. Englewood Cliffs,. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Sims, R.R., 1994. Human resource management's role in clarifying the new psychological contract. Human Resource Management, 33(3): 373-382.

Suazo, M.M., W.H. Turnley and R.R. Mai, 2005. The role of perceived violation in determining employees reactions to psychological contract breach. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 12(1): 24-36.

Syed, S., 2010. Impact of organizational restructuring on psychological contract breach and attitudes of employees working in private commercial banks of Pakistan.

Turnley, W.H., M.C. Bolino, S.W. Lester and J.M. Bloodgood, 2003. The impact of psychological contract fulfillment on the performance of in-role and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 29(2): 187-206.

Weiss, H.M. and R. Cropanzano, 1996. Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work.

Williams, M., 2001. In whom we trust: Group membership as an affective context for trust development. Academy of Management Review, 26(3): 377-396.

Wright, T.A. and D.G. Bonett, 2002. The moderating effects of employee tenure on the relation between organizational commitment and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(6): 1183-1190.

Zhao, H., S.J. Wayne, B.C. Glibkowski and J. Bravo, 2007. The impact of psychological contract breach on work‐related outcomes: A meta‐analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60(3): 647-680.

Views and opinions expressed in this article are the views and opinions of the authors, International Journal of Asian Social Science shall not be responsible or answerable for any loss, damage or liability etc. caused in relation to/arising out of the use of the content.